FDAI logo   ::  Site Map  ::   
Home  |  About This Website  |  Contact Us
Home » ... » Evidence for an Issue

Evidence for an Issue 3 pieces of evidence for this issue.

non-automated pilot tasks may not be integrated (Issue #153) - Automation designers may leave pilots to do the tasks that cannot be automated. The pilots may be left with a set of poorly integrated tasks that are difficult to perform well.

  1.  
  2. Evidence Type: Excerpt from Survey
    Evidence: 16 of the 30 (53%) respondents reported a 4 (= agree) or 5 (= strongly agree) with pc153 non-automated pilot tasks may not be integrated
    Strength: +3
    Aircraft: unspecified
    Equipment: automation
    Source: Lyall, E., Niemczyk, M. & Lyall, R. (1996). Evidence for flightdeck automation problems: A survey of experts. See Resource details

  3.  
  4. Evidence Type: Excerpt from Survey
    Evidence: 9 of the 30 (30%) respondents reported a 1 (=strongly disagree) or a 2 (=disagree) with pc153 non-automated pilot tasks may not be integrated
    Strength: -2
    Aircraft: unspecified
    Equipment: automation
    Source: Lyall, E., Niemczyk, M. & Lyall, R. (1996). Evidence for flightdeck automation problems: A survey of experts. See Resource details

  5.  
  6. Evidence Type: Excerpt from Survey
    Evidence: "Because of missing capacity and redundancy of the ECAM, switching from screen to paper checklist and vice versa was also considered as potentially confusing." (page 11.11)
    Strength: +1
    Aircraft: A310
    Equipment: EICAS (ECAM)
    Source: Speyer, J.J., Monteil, C., Blomberg, R.D., & Fouillot, J.P. (1990). Impact of New Technology on Operational Interface: From Design Aims to Flight Evaluation and Measurement. Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development No. 301, Vol. 1. See Resource details
Flight Deck Automation Issues Website  
© 1997-2013 Research Integrations, Inc.