FDAI logo   ::  Site Map  ::   
Home  |  About This Website  |  Contact Us
Home » ... » Evidence for an Issue

Evidence for an Issue 3 pieces of evidence for this issue.

automation integration may be poor (Issue #11) - The lack of integration of automation systems may increase pilot workload.

  1.  
  2. Evidence Type: Excerpt from Survey
    Evidence: 21 of the 30 (70%) respondents reported a 4 (= agree) or 5 (= strongly agree) with pc11 automation integration may be poor
    Strength: +3
    Aircraft: unspecified
    Equipment: automation
    Source: Lyall, E., Niemczyk, M. & Lyall, R. (1996). Evidence for flightdeck automation problems: A survey of experts. See Resource details

  3.  
  4. Evidence Type: Excerpt from Survey
    Evidence: 2 of the 30 (7%) respondents reported a 1 (=strongly disagree) or a 2 (=disagree) with pc11 automation integration may be poor
    Strength: -1
    Aircraft: unspecified
    Equipment: automation
    Source: Lyall, E., Niemczyk, M. & Lyall, R. (1996). Evidence for flightdeck automation problems: A survey of experts. See Resource details

  5.  
  6. Evidence Type: Excerpt from Survey
    Evidence: "As in the Curry and Wiener surveys on the B-767/MD-80 the coordination of AFS (lateral/vertical) and ATS (autothrust) is not considered fully satisfactory especially in altitude capture during descent or localizer capture in Land mode." (page 11.11)
    Strength: +1
    Aircraft: A310
    Equipment: autoflight: autopilot & autothrust
    Source: Speyer, J.J., Monteil, C., Blomberg, R.D., & Fouillot, J.P. (1990). Impact of New Technology on Operational Interface: From Design Aims to Flight Evaluation and Measurement. Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development No. 301, Vol. 1. See Resource details
Flight Deck Automation Issues Website  
© 1997-2013 Research Integrations, Inc.